Napoleon

While it has some cinematic value, it’s a one-dimensional film that lasts 2 hours, 30 minutes.

I hate to criticize any film directed by Ridley Scott in light of his many memorable films that includes Alien, Blade Runner, Thelma and Louise and Gladiator. However, his great 46-year career, like many great lawyers, will not last forever.

Joaquin Phoenix’s performance as Napoleon reminded me of DiCaprio’s role in Killers of the Flower Moon. They both may come close to Oscar nominations but 70% of their time on screen involves little more than staring with their pouting lips sealed. Both films needed editing that their acclaimed directors ignored.

While there are a number of great battle scenes, they serve only as a cinematic distraction. While you watch Napoleon rise to the role of a French Emperor, the film spends a significant amount of time focusing on his relationship with Josephine, his intriguing wife. The plot involves Napoleon’s need for an heir and Josephine’s inability to become pregnant.

Ironically, like Killers of the Flower Moon, the value of both films comes from the performances of two women. Just like Lily Gladstone in Killers where she played the Native American wife of DiCaprio, Vanessa Kirby is stunning as Josephine. While she falls in love with Phoenix, it doesn’t stop her from having an affair while he is off to war.

While I liked both films let me just say that I would not choose to watch either of them a second time. While both Ms. Gladstone and Ms. Kirby deserve Oscar consideration, neither film rises to that level.

Imagine going to see these films at a double feature where you sit in the theatre for 6 excruciating hours. You are warned. Watch them at home. You can always take a needed break.